Clinton could have continued the transition to renewables that the Obama administration began, and applied the decreased US dependency on fossil fuel as an economic weapon against Russia by depressing global oil prices: Another fairly obvious example is the investment by the current Russian leadership in cyberwar ops against the perceived-as-more-competent candidate in the last US presidential election. Meanwhile, the Trump administration is full of fossil fuel connections. Russia today is primarily an oil and gas exporter, with the world's second largest official reserves after Saudi Arabia, and the current leadership can't help but be aware that they're vulnerable to some of the same factors that brought down the USSR —notably vulnerability to externally induced commodity price fluctuations. Meanwhile, the Trump administration is full of fossil fuel connections. Anyway, those are the two big recent examples; investors pushing Brexit propaganda not because they think leaving the EU would be good for the UK but in the pursuit of short-term profit: Regardless of her other characteristics, Clinton was experienced in foreign affairs and no friend of Russia's.